Call 0191 5550091 or contact me via dean [at] seobegin.com
 
 

Freelance SEO services from SEO Begin Ltd (Sunderland, Tyne and Wear, North East UK) 

Facebook Twitter Gplus E-mail RSS
 
 
formats

Has Twitter Just Handed Google+ a Trust Edge?

You may well have noticed over the past few days that Twitter now appends the majority of URL’s with http://t.co/ followed by a generated shortlink.

You can understand the reasoning behind it, twitter has applied the rel=”nofollow” markup to their links for quite a while now to horde the link juice, not all of it but enough of it.

But third party sites would pull our streams from their API and regenerate them with nofollow gone so there was a small advantage if you were to include the full URL to sites http://www.seobegin.com would resolve as a full link across all of those other sites that you had added a stream for.

Now the emergence of the http://t.co short links have appeared that is no longer the case, or is it?

Mouseover the new shortlinks and the title attribute (title=”") shows the original URL, this is all that is left of your link sharing, this is the benefit left to search marketers.

Away from marketing itself Edward Lewis (@Pageoneresults) raised a very valid point, what if the mouseover did not resolve the original URL?

Do you trust me?

Well, do YOU trust me?

Do we trust each other that much to click on these shared links when we have no idea where they go to?

Twitter trust factor

Twitter t.co Trust Factor?

I for one choose who I follow very carefully but even I can not be 100% confident that the link you are sharing with me is going to be safe.

One hacked account can spread like wildfire, we have seen it many many times, from DM spam through to completely compromised timelines, this has just handed back the initiative to these spammers, well done twitter.

So where does Google+ come in?

Google+ is still finding its feet figuratively speaking, the long awaited brand pages for business are here and I am already seeing a benefit for client sites through updating their brand page, although the vanity URL’s and naming conventions are not exactly the way we would want them to be, I am already seeing huge benefits in engagement for the brand a definite positive and an increased leaning towards the brand pages for business over sharing a link via 140.

How to increase the brand exposure on Google+ Business pages

Firstly the blog is the usual mechanism and trigger behind it all and I have found a huge leaning towards regularly updated brand blogs along with the correct author markup. (Thanks hugely to AJ Kohn for the help with that).

Once you have your author pages marked up correctly and if they are not already have your contributors signed up with their own personal Google+ accounts. Following that set up your Google+ business page and add all of your +authors to your “About” within your brand, this along with connecting to other relevant business pages within your niche sends all of the right signals and within a couple of weeks (if not sooner) your Google+ Brand Page updates are their for your potential customers to see.

Google Plus update in the SERP

Google Plus update in the SERP

It is still the very beginning for Google+ and I am not sounding the death nell for twitter by any means, but when it comes to trust and sharing I want to know where your links are coming from and when it comes to search marketing I believe twitter has just handed Google+ the edge.

One final thing I would like to share is that it will be the first anniversary of the tragic passing of Jaamit Durrani and his close friend Rishi has shared details of his memorial service;

Memorial Fri 25th 1pm Gunnersbury Cemetery then Abadan Restaurant on Northfields Avenue

Get in touch with Rishi to let him know if you are attending

 
formats

Learning to Feel SEO

Published on October 26th, 2011 by in SEO

It has been stewing in my head for quite a while but I could never quite put my finger on it metaphorically speaking, but SEO certification is never going to happen, sure you could probably run a course in the fundementals but a full blown course covering everything from learning HTML through to distinguishing link patterns and separating the shite and chaff from the shine is not going to stand still while you figure out your methods.

The true learning of how to implement SEO along with best practices for SEM is learned over a period of years… I am still learning more than a decade later, don’t get me wrong I know what I am doing and I achieve the desired results for my clients, probably not at the scale I and they would like, but I get there.

This all did not come about by fluking it, it took a lot of learning in the field, building my own sites, testing them, fucking them up and testing new ones while learning from my experiences. It has me at a stage right now where you get a “Feel” for a new site the first time you visit it, that “feel” comes from experience, time served experience in both learning from the mistakes you have made, learning from the mistakes of others (after testing them) and all the while staying on top of developments and keeping your clients sites moving in the right direction.

It is a very hard metaphor to translate into the written word, but you do come to a point where your first instinct when visiting a site whether you have anything to do with it or not is to get a look at the source code, navigate your way to the robots.txt critique the navigation while inwardly thinking “I would have done that differently”.

And that is precisely my point, time served SEO’s will have a “feel” for a site long before they even get to the code, they just “know”. They know this because they have spent loooong nights looking at code, writing code, watching the effects both good and bad.

So how are we to distinguish between those new to SEO that have not had the time in the field and those that bang the drum?

Candidates walking into an interview would not get far by proclaiming “I Feel SEO”, they would receive a kind of look with head tilted to one side that would suggest “this guy is crackers”. Personally I would sit them in front of a machine and ask them to create 3 simple pages coding HTML using Notepad from a short list of topics the candidate could choose from.

Sounds simple right? It can’t be that simple, but as a potential employer looking to train a new search marketer in my team, that’s how I would approach it. From there I would scale a series of the fundamentals.

This is to me not a clearer indication of what an SEO is or even does because my methods are not the same as other freelancers, agencies and consultants. For all I may have been around a while even I would find it difficult to walk into an agency and fit right in, I would have to adapt and learn their processes and ways of approach, our fundamentals are essentially the same but in many ways a world apart. But we both could approach a new site and objectively have a “feel” for it pretty much instantly, within seconds. You can’t teach that. It’s learned with time.

 
formats

All Google TLD’s

Published on October 12th, 2011 by in SEO

Sometimes I will see a referring Google TLD in my analytics and wonder “Where is that?”, most of them I know but on occasion another one pops up that has me scratching my head. This is a resource for me to refer to, maybe you will find a use for it.

  1. www.google.ad
    Andorra
  2. www.google.ae
    الامارات العربية المتحدة
  3. www.google.com.af
    افغانستان
  4. www.google.com.ag
    Antigua and Barbuda
  5. www.google.com.ai
    Anguilla
  6. www.google.am
    Հայաստան
  7. www.google.co.ao
    Angola
  8. www.google.com.ar
    Argentina
  9. www.google.as
    American Samoa
  10. www.google.at
    Österreich
  11. www.google.com.au
    Australia
  12. www.google.az
    Azərbaycan
  13. www.google.ba
    Bosna i Hercegovina
  14. www.google.com.bd
    বাংলাদেশ
  15. www.google.be
    België
  16. www.google.bf
    Burkina Faso
  17. www.google.bg
    България
  18. www.google.com.bh
    البحرين
  19. www.google.bi
    Burundi
  20. www.google.bj
    Bénin
  21. www.google.com.bn
    Brunei
  22. www.google.com.bo
    Bolivia
  23. www.google.com.br
    Brasil
  24. www.google.bs
    The Bahamas
  25. www.google.co.bw
    Botswana
  26. www.google.by
    Беларусь
  27. www.google.com.bz
    Belize
  28. www.google.ca
    Canada
  29. www.google.cd
    Rep. Dem. du Congo
  30. www.google.cf
    Centrafrique
  31. www.google.cg
    Rep. du Congo
  32. www.google.ch
    Schweiz
  33. www.google.ci
    Côte d’Ivoire
  34. www.google.co.ck
    Cook Islands
  35. www.google.cl
    Chile
  36. www.google.cm
    Cameroun
  37. www.google.cn
    中国
  38. www.google.com.co
    Colombia
  39. www.google.co.cr
    Costa Rica
  40. www.google.com.cu
    Cuba
  41. www.google.cz
    Česká republika
  42. www.google.de
    Deutschland
  43. www.google.dj
    Djibouti
  44. www.google.dk
    Danmark
  45. www.google.dm
    Dominica
  46. www.google.com.do
    República Dominicana
  47. www.google.dz
    Algérie
  48. www.google.com.ec
    Ecuador
  49. www.google.ee
    Eesti
  50. www.google.com.eg
    مصر
  51. www.google.es
    España
  52. www.google.com.et
    ኢትዮጵያ
  53. www.google.fi
    Suomi
  54. www.google.com.fj
    Fiji
  55. www.google.fm
    Micronesia
  56. www.google.fr
    France
  57. www.google.ga
    Gabon
  58. www.google.ge
    საქართველო
  59. www.google.gg
    Guernsey
  60. www.google.com.gh
    Ghana
  61. www.google.com.gi
    Gibraltar
  62. www.google.gl
    Grønland
  63. www.google.gm
    The Gambia
  64. www.google.gp
    Guadeloupe
  65. www.google.gr
    Ελλάδα
  66. www.google.com.gt
    Guatemala
  67. www.google.gy
    Guyana
  68. www.google.com.hk
    香港
  69. www.google.hn
    Honduras
  70. www.google.hr
    Hrvatska
  71. www.google.ht
    Haïti
  72. www.google.hu
    Magyarország
  73. www.google.co.id
    Indonesia
  74. www.google.ie
    Ireland
  75. www.google.co.il
    ישראל
  76. www.google.im
    Isle of Man
  77. www.google.co.in
    India
  78. www.google.iq
    العراق
  79. www.google.is
    Ísland
  80. www.google.it
    Italia
  81. www.google.je
    Jersey
  82. www.google.com.jm
    Jamaica
  83. www.google.jo
    الأردن
  84. www.google.co.jp
    日本
  85. www.google.co.ke
    Kenya
  86. www.google.com.kh
    ព្រះរាជាណាចក្រកម្ពុជា
  87. www.google.ki
    Kiribati
  88. www.google.kg
    Кыргызстан
  89. www.google.co.kr
    한국
  90. www.google.com.kw
    ‫الكويت
  91. www.google.kz
    Қазақстан
  92. www.google.la
    ລາວ
  93. www.google.com.lb
    لبنان
  94. www.google.li
    Liechtenstein
  95. www.google.lk
    Sri Lanka
  96. www.google.co.ls
    Lesotho
  97. www.google.lt
    Lietuvos
  98. www.google.lu
    Luxemburg
  99. www.google.lv
    Latvija
  100. www.google.com.ly
    ليبيــا
  101. www.google.co.ma
    Maroc
  102. www.google.md
    Moldova
  103. www.google.me
    Crna Gora
  104. www.google.mg
    Madagasikara
  105. www.google.mk
    Македонија
  106. www.google.ml
    Mali
  107. www.google.mn
    Монгол улс
  108. www.google.ms
    Montserrat
  109. www.google.com.mt
    Malta
  110. www.google.mu
    Mauritius
  111. www.google.mv
    Maldives
  112. www.google.mw
    Malawi
  113. www.google.com.mx
    México
  114. www.google.com.my
    Malaysia
  115. www.google.co.mz
    Moçambique
  116. www.google.com.na
    Namibia
  117. www.google.com.nf
    Norfolk Island
  118. www.google.com.ng
    Nigeria
  119. www.google.com.ni
    Nicaragua
  120. www.google.ne
    Niger
  121. www.google.nl
    Nederland
  122. www.google.no
    Norge
  123. www.google.com.np
    नेपाल
  124. www.google.nr
    Nauru
  125. www.google.nu
    Niue
  126. www.google.co.nz
    New Zealand
  127. www.google.com.om
    عُمان
  128. www.google.com.pa
    Panamá
  129. www.google.com.pe
    Perú
  130. www.google.com.ph
    Pilipinas
  131. www.google.com.pk
    Pakistan
  132. www.google.pl
    Polska
  133. www.google.pn
    Pitcairn Islands
  134. www.google.com.pr
    Puerto Rico
  135. www.google.ps
    الأراضي الفلسطينية
  136. www.google.pt
    Portugal
  137. www.google.com.py
    Paraguay
  138. www.google.com.qa
    قطر
  139. www.google.ro
    România
  140. www.google.ru
    Россия
  141. www.google.rw
    Rwanda
  142. www.google.com.sa
    السعودية
  143. www.google.com.sb
    Solomon Islands
  144. www.google.sc
    Sesel
  145. www.google.se
    Sverige
  146. www.google.com.sg
    Singapore
  147. www.google.sh
    Saint Helena
  148. www.google.si
    Slovenija
  149. www.google.sk
    Slovensko
  150. www.google.com.sl
    Sierra Leone
  151. www.google.sn
    Sénégal
  152. www.google.so
    Soomaaliya
  153. www.google.sm
    San Marino
  154. www.google.st
    São Tomé e Príncipe
  155. www.google.com.sv
    El Salvador
  156. www.google.td
    Tchad
  157. www.google.tg
    Togo
  158. www.google.co.th
    ประเทศไทย
  159. www.google.com.tj
    Tajikistan
  160. www.google.tk
    Tokelau
  161. www.google.tl
    Timor-Leste
  162. www.google.tm
    Türkmenistan
  163. www.google.tn
    تونس
  164. www.google.to
    Tonga
  165. www.google.com.tr
    Türkiye
  166. www.google.tt
    Trinidad and Tobago
  167. www.google.com.tw
    台灣
  168. www.google.co.tz
    Tanzania
  169. www.google.com.ua
    Україна
  170. www.google.co.ug
    Uganda
  171. www.google.co.uk
    UK
  172. www.google.com.uy
    Uruguay
  173. www.google.co.uz
    O’zbekiston
  174. www.google.com.vc
    Saint Vincent
    and the Grenadines
  175. www.google.co.ve
    Venezuela
  176. www.google.vg
    British Virgin Islands
  177. www.google.co.vi
    Virgin Islands
  178. www.google.com.vn
    Việt Nam
  179. www.google.vu
    Vanuatu
  180. www.google.ws
    Samoa
  181. www.google.rs
    Србија
  182. www.google.co.za
    South Africa
  183. www.google.co.zm
    Zambia
  184. www.google.co.zw
    Zimbabwe
 
Tags:
formats

This is a Robots Test (Please Ignore)

Looking to see how much of the robots.txt file is honoured/followed, I have placed a link within the robots.txt file here and more importantly over at http://www.deancruddace.co.uk/robots.txt to see if the URL within that file gets picked up and indexed, knowing fine well that the site receives rare bot traffic I thought I would drop a hint through posting here to give the search bots a little nudge.

 
formats

One Week of Feeding SEO News Into Twitter

We all know sharing is caring, who I follow and who follows me really is a large concentration of people within the internet marketing industry. Every day we see fresh content in our streams and since we are all at different stages within our careers what may be old news to you is a fresh new avenue to discover for others. I decided I would gauge what kind of engagement I would receive by feeding SEO news directly into my twitter stream.

How did I do it?

Firstly I needed a reliable source of steady fresh news, I do have my own decks for this but on this occasion I used the RSS feed for the slashtag /seoblogs within Blekko. I know this to be a healthy and monitored slashtag because I am an associate editor along with 6 others including Tad Chef.

Next I would need a way to feed the RSS into Twitter, there are quite a few tools out there to do this but after playing with it previously on other projects I settled on Dlvr.it (free), this has an array of features like scheduling, adding content pre & post message, hashtagging, tweet stats etc. All the usual suspects. I opted for the clean and simple “Just post the latest message with the shorty URL”.

What Was My Aim?

If I am honest I did not have an overall aim beyond seeing how engaged my following was with the content I was sharing from resources they may have never come across before, I knew the content I was sharing was actually relevant to those that followed.

How Did it Turn Out?

In the week of testing the most popular posts clicked via my sharing from my first tweet to my last were;

More Numbers

Beyond those 80 clicks to posts there were a total of 314 clicks from 197 tweets.

I did see an increase in followers.

Increase in Twitter followers

Increased followers (via Crowdbooster)

While not a huge fan of Klout there was an increase in “Influence score”. How much stock you put into Klout is up to you, but I know some of you take an interest.

Increase in Klout score

Increase in Klout score (via Klout)

Conclusions
Along the way I did manage to bookmark a few of the articles that I was auto-tweeting and some will go in the end of year round up, I would never have discovered some of the great content being posted and have found new reading resources that I may also be adding to SEO Bloggers.

Funnily enough along the way I also noticed @Graywolf making reference to sharing content from other sources beyond your own self promotion (from SMX) and something along the lines of sharing 15-20% of others content, I may have over egged the pudding a little but I can see exactly where he is coming from and with a modicum of control you too can share the content by setting up your sources to a similar percentage from your trusted sources of SEO info and share it with me!

How did you find my sharing along the way? Useful?

 
formats

Keeping an Eye on Your Competitors the Easy Way

Published on July 14th, 2011 by in SEM

Its a big old bad world out there & irrespective of how big or small your clients website offering may be, they have competition. Competition that is continuously evolving to try and stay ahead of each other through content creation.

As SEO’s and search marketing folk we evolve to stay that one step ahead, keeping an eye on the competition for our clients is a must, delivering actionable insights in our reports is a must.

How Do We Keep an Eye on Our Competitors Content?

There are umpteen ways to achieve this but one of the ways I have been using more and more is through the use of RSS feeds delivered into customized decks. The point of this being that myself and clients only have to skim read one page instead of having to resort to navigating to each competitors website in turn.

Of course “Google Reader” may well be meandering its way to your lips right now but of course not every client has a Google Profile nor the time to go and set up subscriptions to every competitors website and that’s just for those competitors that have an RSS feed, what of those that don’t have one? Yep I have that covered.

The Customized Deck

There are a couple of ways to pull the RSS feeds & they both use WordPress to achieve it. WordPress as you may already know has RSS built in the other way is through the MultiFeedSnap plugin both methods allow for multiple RSS feeds with MultiFeedSnap having the slight edge because of code hacks you can apply.

So what of the sites that do not have RSS feeds?

Again there are a few solutions to create RSS feeds from static content but by far and away the most user friendly way for me is Dapper with a simple UI to extract the elements you want to create feeds for.

How does creating RSS feeds for our competition really benefit our clients?

Well if you have competitors that update prices through their own vendors on a daily basis it’s not a bad idea to keep an eye on those to compare against your own clients offering.

How does this all relate to SEO/SEM?

Plain and simple you get an edge into seeing what the competition is up to and provide better content recommendations back to your clients with the obvious benefits of having more quality content.

An example in the wild?

We all spend an extraordinary amount of time reading up on SEO that has been channelled through twitter, facebook et al but I thought I would make my life easier by setting up a single deck to browse all ofthe latest posts from my regular haunts in one place so I created SEO Bloggers which works by using the built in RSS from WordPress.

 
formats

SEO Bloggers

Published on May 11th, 2011 by in SEO

Where do I stay updated on all of the latest SEO information doing the rounds or the juicy golden nuggets that go on to be a part of my SEO best practices?

If I am not conducting research of my own into seeing what works and what what doesn’t via my vanity domain or on here I would ordinarily have kept up to date via Google Reader. Great at what it is Google reader is a few more clicks and a login and yet a few more clicks away from where I want to get at the info. Like most SEO’s a good chunk of time is staying up to date in our industry and so it made perfect sense to create (& curate) a site full of my regular SEO haunts and resources and so SEO Bloggers was born.

I am not expecting to turn this into a site to grab SERP’s, it’s a one page site after all and just full of links fed via RSS. It is what it is a resource nothing more or less. It’s you lot behind it anyway, I just have you all in one place and can skin read the latest posts. In all honesty I am as guilty as most & don’t update too often when it comes to blogging & even when I venture outside of the domains I control to guest blog for the occasional site, it is a rare outing.

I don’t intend to build the site into a monster directory even I don’t have the time to read that much. So in short it will be a curated list of sites, nothing fancy.

Go and have a look: http://seobloggers.co.uk

 
formats

SEO Company Directory

Published on April 1st, 2011 by in SEO
SEO Company Directory

SEO Company Directory

A short and sweet post but, you may have noticed me tweeting about a new SEO Company Directory that myself and Doc Sheldon have put together. It does not get much simpler. Go and add your SEO services!

 
formats

Google Analytics Internet Usage and You

Published on March 21st, 2011 by in SEO

You delve into Google Analytics on occasion and you marvel at how visitors are finding your website with words you would never have dreamed of using yourself and you may think how?

This could lead you into investigating further which will eventually lead you on to the right path to turning your online presence into an even more competitive proposition.

All of a sudden you notice a dramatic drop in visitors to your site, you understand the basics of how search works and you know that those visitors to your site have taken a dive, dramatic enough to have you scratching your head and thinking why?

You have done nothing with your site since it was launched, you have added content day after day or whenever time allowed. From what is already a stressful situation in managing every other aspect of your business, you don`t have time to go looking for the whys, to begin with if you have never even delved into SEO, so how are you supposed to know you have some kind of duplicate content or paid link penalty? Do you even know what they are? Who would tell you if you had?

You are not alone, and in all probability that number is growing, there are an estimated;

  • 6.9 Billion people on the planet
  • 2.1 Billion of those have internet access

Of those 2.1 Billion internet users there are an estimated 129 Million+ domains. That number would increase furthermore if you also consider that there are currently 306 TLD`s. So a conservative estimate of 200 million+ commercial websites if we take into account country specific TLD`s.

So the potential of 2.1 Billion consumers worldwide with a rough estimate of 9 Million active site owners serving content across 100 Million active websites.

Those numbers fall down fairly quickly because there is currently no published data on how many active site owners there are on the planet. It would be a very hard number to accomplish or conclude, hence an estimate.

Now consider that of those commercial websites there will be quite a few of those estimated 9 million site owners competing in the same search spaces of travel, financial, gaming etc at any level of SEO. Does that leave more than 191 Million websites left untouched by any kind of SEO? or from another angle less than 1 in 20 websites are even aware of what SEO is?

There is a point to this post, hang in there.

I suggested that not every business owner online has either time nor inclanation that SEO exists. So what happens when a major search engine tweaks their algorithm, which results in re-ranking of sites based on factors to counter act spam efforts. Yes there will always be collateral damage to sites.

My main concern though is that of the collateral damage, what of the site owners that had no clue that they were supposed to use a “nofollow” on a paid link, or that they have canonical issues because they have 40 product pages that look the same to the spiders crawling there site.

How many site owners go beyond the use of their free Google Analytics package and even enable Webmaster Tools?
What of the sites that do not even use an analytics package at all? As a business owner you may want to look into integrating Google Analytics or any number of other paid or free analytics packages.

How about a simple message from within GA to notify site owners that there has been a change to the guidelines or an update to the algorithm that may effect how they could be found in organic search. Again this would be helpful to the reported 12 million sites that are using GA.

Thoughts?

 
formats

10 SEO Questions with Darren Shaw

Darren Shaw

Darren Shaw

Darren Shaw has been developing websites since 1996 and has been optimizing them for the search engines since 2001. He loves all areas of internet marketing, but is currently obsessed with local SEO. He is the founder of an Edmonton Search Engine Optimization company, Whitespark, and developed the popular Local Citation Finder tool for helping SEOs and businesses find citations. Follow Darren on Twitter.

Along with Garrett French, Ben Wills what was the biggest inspiration behind building the Local Citation Finder?

There wasn’t really any inspiration. Garrett came up with an original and brilliant idea, wrote this awesome post about it, and I figured I could build a tool to automate the process. We had the first version of the tool working in a couple days. Hundreds of development hours later, we have built it into a powerful citation analysis tool. It’s the only citation analysis tool on the market as far as I know.

From the latter end of 2010 and the introduction into the SERP`s of more generic keywords, how has this impacted on the results the LCF is fetching, has it improved the number of sources?

That’s a great question. I hadn’t compared the number of sources before and after the rollout of the new SERPs. I just ran a few new searches to see the difference:

Edmonton Flowers
August 17th, 2010: 207 citation sources
Feb 3rd, 2011: 310 citation sources

Edmonton Plumbing
August 30th, 2010: 174 citation sources
Feb 3rd, 2011: 243 citation sources

Edmonton Windows
Sept 22nd, 2010: 216 citation sources
Feb 3rd, 2011: 244 citation sources

Unfortunately I don’t have test data from right before the change, and right after. That would be more valuable for this question. There certainly appears to be an increase though. That could be because Google is giving the top positions to businesses with more citations, or, it could be just that those businesses with the top positions for these terms have been working on their citation building over the past 6 months.

My gut tells me that when the SERPs changed it naturally increased the number of citations the tool returned because the sites with top rankings would now have stronger organic SEO, and thus, more links and more citations. Before, you could have top rankings with a claimed place page, a well targeted and claimed Place Page, a few citations, and plenty of reviews. Now, you need to have strong onsite and offsite organic SEO as well.

Local SEO is fast becoming a must have tactic and Andrew Shotland and Mike Blumenthal among others have been at the forefront for a while now, how do you see Local SEO developing over the coming year?

Local is exploding. I think you’ll see many new Local SEO focused businesses open and a number of Local SEO tools come out. Small businesses are scaling back their Yellow Pages spend and turning to Local SEO in droves. It’s about time! I have some clients that were paying Yellow Pages $5000/month for all the advertising they were doing with them. That’s nuts. In many markets, the return on investment from a Local SEO campaign is 100 times what you get from Yellow Pages.

In addition to Andrew Shotland (@localseoguide) and Mike Blumenthal (@mblumenthal), I would recommend also following David Mihm (@davidmihm), Matt McGee (@mattmcgee), Chris Silver Smith (@si1very), Mike Ramsey (@niftymarketing), and fellow Canadians Dev Basu (@devbasu), Matthew Hunt (@smbusinesscoach), and Steve Hatcher (@axemedia) .

Geo-tagging sites like Foursquare and Gowalla are a consideration for SEO for local search and citations, do you see an expansion in this direction or have these sites nailed it already?

Yes, I think we’ll see huge expansion. I’m sure we’ll see more and more companies add check-in features. We’ve already seen Facebook places, and Twitter places, and I can see Google HotPot adding check-in options as well, but I don’t expect it to be very successful.
Foursquare continues to dominate and innovate in this space, and I think they will for the foreseeable future. Small businesses should get involved with Foursquare now. There is low competition, so, it’s a great opportunity to get your business front and center on the service. I could go on, but Chuck Reynolds nails it in these two posts:

Local Search Marketing Using Foursquare
What Foursquare 3 Means to Small Business

If there was one single tip you could give to a site owner for Local Search what would it be?

Only one?! You won’t get top rankings if you only do one thing, but if I can only provide a single tip it would be to make sure your NAP (name, address, phone number) are consistent everywhere on the web. So, don’t use call tracking numbers (this is related, so, still just one tip!). See: http://searchengineland.com/the-problem-of-inconsistent-smb-contact-details-%E2%80%93-part-i-37322.

Bonus tip: with the new blended local results, links to your website with localized anchor text (eg: chicago hair salons) are the fast track to top rankings. Do some backlink analysis on your top competitors and look specifically at the links with optimized anchor text. Figure out how they are getting those, and do the same. Look at the top ranking businesses in other major cities for more ideas.

Is Local search citation in the quantity or the quality, should we be building citations enmasse or concentrating on the same sites that rear their heads for the keyphrase?

As in link building, it’s both. You want plenty of citations, but, a single good citation can be worth 100 junk citations. To determine the value of a citation source, I like to use the same metrics that I use in link building: Age of Domain, SEOmoz Domain Authority, and Majestic AC Rank. We also have our own metric that we developed through the data collected from the Local Citation Finder. We’re still tweaking the algorithm, but should have it ready to release within a couple of months.

Judging the value of a citation source requires more than just evaluating the link building metrics though. You have to think local. In my opinion, a mention on a small hyper-local blog with your name, address, and phone number is more valuable than a superpages.com listing, even though superpages is going to have much higher values when you look at the link building metrics.

I have not seen raw volume of citations be the dominant ranking factor. In all the competitive analysis reports we’ve put together, the businesses with the most rankings are not always the businesses with the most citations. You can see a real world example of this in the example competitive analysis report that is linked on our local SEO description page.
I like to use sponsorships for quality citations. Find a local sports team or charity with your city in the domain name, and decent backlink strength, and sponsor them. Be sure to get your NAP and an anchor text optimized link out of the deal.

How much does personalised search skew the Local Search results?

Great question! I really don’t know. I would assume it would affect local results in the same way it affects organic results. I just ran some tests and I definitely get different results if I’m signed in. The sites I visit most often rank higher when I’m signed in. So, I’m just going to assume that local is skewed by personalization as much as organic.

As a small business owner or new to Local SEO where should I be looking to for further reading on getting started?

I really like Dev Basu’s five part article on Web Marketing Today. It’s a perfect beginner’s guide to place page optimization, website optimization for local, citation building, and review acquisition. Plus, you can read the whole thing in under 30 minutes.
For further reading, these are my favourite sources:

How did you first start out into delving into the SEO space?

I built an e-commerce store for my sister’s company, Education Station, back in 2001. We started looking at search results for “teaching supplies” and wanted to get ranked. Oh it was so easy back then! I did some research and learned the basics of title tags, image alts, general keyword stuffing, and link building. I built a script to auto-email all these small websites with lists of “teacher resources”.

I’d search around for the sites, find their contact info, then add them to my script. “Hello $name, I was just checking out your site with awesome teacher resources. Great site! Have you seen Education Station’s new site? I think it would fit in perfectly with the other links you have on the page.” Back then, my success rate with this tactic was about 70%!! These days, anyone with a “links” page has probably had to get a new email address because of the spam.

2011 for SEO is the year of ….. ?

Local, of course! More search engine focus on local, more local specialists, more local tools, more local SEO awareness.

Huge thank you to Darren for agreeing to the interview and I think you will agree, packed with insights. Want more? you are insatiable, ok read more SEO Questions.

 
 
© SEO Begin Ltd
credit